Hi
Posting with the subject "Area censorship" is not exactly fair.
Something like "Area spam filter ate my message" would be more accurate
in this case. Unless you really believe that the Area moderators are
censors, except in this specific case.
It's like posting "Softimage tech support worthless" to say that
Softimage tech support did in fact help you.
Stephen Blair
On 05/01/2013 7:00 AM, Fx Person wrote:
Depressing that The Area does not censor?
I personally found the opposite to be true..
Otherwise, thought I had to say so not to spread claims that turned
out to be false.
and I said I would to Maurice.
about my name, maybe I don't know..
Anyways, I said what I had to so I'm done.
Cheers! ;)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* jo benayoun <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Friday, January 4, 2013 9:58 PM
your message is depressing dude!
take it easy!
Also would be a good idea to setup a real name instead of the 'FX
Person'...
--jo
2013/1/4 Fx Person <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
Hello!
To clarify a situation,
I have forwarded here an Email sent to Cory Mogk and Maurice Patel
on the "Rumors" thread,
which included the following when talking about my post that was
blocked::
_________________________
.. and was immediately presented with a
"your post is held for moderation" message.
After a week I assumed that it wouldn't show-up (as it didn't since),
.. but what made me -NOT- think that "held for moderation"
actually meant "held for censorship" ...
________________________________
And to clarify, after subsequent discussions with Maurice, Cory,
and Nicolas Leduc (Area Admin I think)
it seems that it was the spam filter which intercepted my post .
(perhaps due to the fact that I was also the last poster on that
same thread adding something)
So if I gave the impression that The Area censored it's forums, my
apologies.
Thanks and Happy New Year everyone!
