Point taken, I agree the title could have been made lighter (or less dramatic)
Your example might have been a bit harsh though, would be more like "about SI tech support untrustworthiness" (for a message saying that it might have wrongfully be suggested as untrustworthy) is essentially neutral . I just hope the crux of the original message (far from being about censorship) did not go in vain (or that anyone concerned may also be able to take criticism) Thanks F ________________________________ From: Stephen Blair <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 7:43 AM Subject: RE: Area censorship Hi Posting with the subject "Area censorship" is not exactly fair. Something like "Area spam filter ate my message" would be more accurate in this case. Unless you really believe that the Area moderators are censors, except in this specific case. It's like posting "Softimage tech support worthless" to say that Softimage tech support did in fact help you. Stephen Blair On 05/01/2013 7:00 AM, Fx Person wrote: Depressing that The Area does not censor? > >I personally found the opposite to be true.. > >Otherwise, thought I had to say so not to spread claims that turned out to be false. >and I said I would to Maurice. > >about my name, maybe I don't know.. > > >Anyways, I said what I had to so I'm done. > >Cheers! ;) > > > > > > > >________________________________ > From: jo benayoun <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 9:58 PM > > >your message is depressing dude! >take it easy! >Also would be a good idea to setup a real name instead of the 'FX Person'... >--jo > > > > > >2013/1/4 Fx Person <[email protected]> > > >>Hello! >> >> >> >>To clarify a situation, >> >> >> >>I have forwarded here an Email sent to Cory Mogk and Maurice Patel on the >>"Rumors" thread, >> >>which included the following when talking about my post that was blocked:: >>_________________________ >>.. and was immediately presented with a >>"your post is held for moderation" message. >> >>After a week I assumed that it wouldn't show-up (as it didn't since), >> >>.. but what made me -NOT- think that "held for moderation" >>actually meant "held for censorship" ... >>________________________________ >> >>And to clarify, after subsequent discussions with Maurice, Cory, and Nicolas Leduc (Area Admin I think) >>it seems that it was the spam filter which intercepted my post . >>(perhaps due to the fact that I was also the last poster on that same thread adding something) >> >>So if I gave the impression that The Area censored it's forums, my apologies. >> >>Thanks and Happy New Year everyone! >> >> >> > > >
