If you have the time, can you explain the workflow with using both octane and softimage without an interactive viewport in soft??
Thanks On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Toonafish <[email protected]> wrote: > an I7 3930 with a Geforce GTX 960 with 2048 MB, but I'd go for more > memory on the card if possible. > > > > On 2/13/2013 16:08, Ed Manning wrote: > > mind sharing your system config? I'm debating what card to put in a box > for Octane > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Toonafish <[email protected]> wrote: > >> yep, been playing with it the last few days and I'm really impressed by >> the speed and quality of Octane. >> >> But comparing both Arnold and Octane, all I can say is for most stuff >> Arnold is still better suited and production proven, but Octane is a nice >> addition. Some scenes I tested that took forever to render in Arnold render >> in just a few minutes in Octane. >> >> Can't wait for the interactive viewport plugin for Softimage though. >> >> - Ronald >> >> >> On 2/13/2013 15:00, Emilio Hernandez wrote: >> >> Anyone here has used octane render within Softimage? >> >> If so I will appreciate your comments and your point of view of Octane >> vs other renders you have used. >> >> And if you have used Arnold and Octane, which one you prefer. >> >> >> I have the Octane experience only from the videos and the demo. It >> seems to me that it is like Maxwell but a lot faster. >> >> Cheers! >> >> >> -- >> >> >> > >
