just to show off the speed ;-)

stopped after 10 minutes rendering: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/4271217/octane_classroom_10min.png



On 2/13/2013 17:37, Emilio Hernandez wrote:
Thanks Ronald. Too bad developers are only aiming at Maya and Max from AD "suite". I admire the job that independent developers are putting into this. I think I'll pass until the viewport is integrated in Softimage. Hope it will not take as long as V-ray...

Even that Maxwell for rendering uses it's own. The workflow beween Softimage and Maxwell is great with Fire. No fooling around or tweaking things outside the software. I hope that Next Limit will add the GPU processing and perhaps it will be as fast as Octane.


2013/2/13 Toonafish <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

    Nope, this is the best there is for SI at the moment as far as I know.

    - Ronald


    On 2/13/2013 17:14, Emilio Hernandez wrote:
Is the interactive window in softimage plugin available yet? Personally I don't like switching between apps to see how the
    render is coming.


    2013/2/13 Toonafish <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>

        Just watch the video in this thread and install the addon:
        http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=24365

        Make sure you also download and replace the dll that is
        mentioned later on in the thread, and if your SI camera does
        not export correctly, try changing the default units in the
        Octane prefs to meters.

        - Ronald



        On 2/13/2013 16:27, Jimmy Marrero wrote:
        If you have the time, can you explain the workflow with
        using both octane and softimage without an interactive
        viewport in soft??


        Thanks


        On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Toonafish
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            an I7 3930 with a Geforce GTX 960 with 2048 MB, but I'd
            go for more memory on the card if possible.



            On 2/13/2013 16:08, Ed Manning wrote:
            mind sharing your system config?  I'm debating what
            card to put in a box for Octane

            On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Toonafish
            <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

                yep, been playing with it the last few days and I'm
                really impressed by the speed and quality of Octane.

                But comparing both Arnold and Octane, all I can say
                is for most stuff Arnold is still better suited and
                production proven, but Octane is a nice addition.
                Some scenes I tested that took forever to render in
                Arnold render in just a few minutes in Octane.

                Can't wait for the interactive viewport plugin for
                Softimage though.

                - Ronald


                On 2/13/2013 15:00, Emilio Hernandez wrote:
                Anyone here has used octane render within Softimage?

                If so I will appreciate your comments and your
                point of view of Octane vs other renders you have
                used.

                And if you have used Arnold and Octane, which one
                you prefer.


                I have the Octane experience only from the videos
                and the demo.  It seems to me that it is like
                Maxwell but a lot faster.

                Cheers!


--








--




--


Reply via email to