show me the pudding !
- Ronald
On 2/14/2013 03:10, Andreas Bystrom wrote:
prman can render that classroom in 7.5 minutes with better quality
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Toonafish <ron...@toonafish.nl
<mailto:ron...@toonafish.nl>> wrote:
just to show off the speed ;-)
stopped after 10 minutes rendering:
On 2/13/2013 17:37, Emilio Hernandez wrote:
Thanks Ronald. Too bad developers are only aiming at Maya and
Max from AD "suite". I admire the job that independent
developers are putting into this. I think I'll pass until the
viewport is integrated in Softimage. Hope it will not take as
long as V-ray...
Even that Maxwell for rendering uses it's own. The workflow
beween Softimage and Maxwell is great with Fire. No fooling
around or tweaking things outside the software. I hope that Next
Limit will add the GPU processing and perhaps it will be as fast
as Octane.
2013/2/13 Toonafish <ron...@toonafish.nl
<mailto:ron...@toonafish.nl>>
Nope, this is the best there is for SI at the moment as far
as I know.
- Ronald
On 2/13/2013 17:14, Emilio Hernandez wrote:
Is the interactive window in softimage plugin available yet?
Personally I don't like switching between apps to see how
the render is coming.
2013/2/13 Toonafish <ron...@toonafish.nl
<mailto:ron...@toonafish.nl>>
Just watch the video in this thread and install the
addon:
http://render.otoy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=29&t=24365
Make sure you also download and replace the dll that is
mentioned later on in the thread, and if your SI camera
does not export correctly, try changing the default
units in the Octane prefs to meters.
- Ronald
On 2/13/2013 16:27, Jimmy Marrero wrote:
If you have the time, can you explain the workflow with
using both octane and softimage without an interactive
viewport in soft??
Thanks
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Toonafish
<ron...@toonafish.nl <mailto:ron...@toonafish.nl>> wrote:
an I7 3930 with a Geforce GTX 960 with 2048 MB, but
I'd go for more memory on the card if possible.
On 2/13/2013 16:08, Ed Manning wrote:
mind sharing your system config? I'm debating
what card to put in a box for Octane
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Toonafish
<ron...@toonafish.nl <mailto:ron...@toonafish.nl>>
wrote:
yep, been playing with it the last few days
and I'm really impressed by the speed and
quality of Octane.
But comparing both Arnold and Octane, all I
can say is for most stuff Arnold is still
better suited and production proven, but
Octane is a nice addition. Some scenes I
tested that took forever to render in Arnold
render in just a few minutes in Octane.
Can't wait for the interactive viewport plugin
for Softimage though.
- Ronald
On 2/13/2013 15:00, Emilio Hernandez wrote:
Anyone here has used octane render within
Softimage?
If so I will appreciate your comments and
your point of view of Octane vs other renders
you have used.
And if you have used Arnold and Octane, which
one you prefer.
I have the Octane experience only from the
videos and the demo. It seems to me that it
is like Maxwell but a lot faster.
Cheers!
--
--
--
--
Andreas Byström
Weta Digital
