PySide runs fine in 2.6 if that's what you mean. Might have to compile it yourself though. Not sure what binaries they are distributing.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Sebastien Sterling < [email protected]> wrote: > is pyside just a more up to date version of the version of python > currently supported by softimage ? > > > On 10 May 2013 02:36, Jeremie Passerin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ohh Nice ! >> >> >> On 9 May 2013 17:33, joshxsi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> PySide is much more pythonic with data, strings etc are just strings not >>> QStrings. >>> >>> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Differences_Between_PySide_and_PyQt >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Jeremie Passerin >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Can I ask what's the main differences between PySide and PyQt4 ? >>>> Is that just licensing ? >>>> >>>> Jeremie >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9 May 2013 17:04, Steven Caron <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey Gang >>>>> >>>>> Tony Barbieri and I have been working on official support for PySide >>>>> with the PyQtForSoftimage plugin and I need some testers... >>>>> >>>>> Who here wants to use PySide instead of PyQt4? It is a little rough >>>>> right now so, only people that really want to use PySide should contact >>>>> me. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Steven >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- -tony
