That's great to hear, guys!
I've heard rumors that PySide isn't being maintained nearly as actively
as PyQt. Is this true, and does it matter?
-Tim
On 5/9/2013 8:38 PM, Sebastien Sterling wrote:
found an artical about the key differences between pyqt and pyside and
as Stephen said the main difference seems to be the licensing : GPL
for pyqt, and LGPL for Pyside. also piside is being maintained by
nokia. here is the article if any other laymen are wondering.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1297660/pyside-vs-pyqt
On 10 May 2013 03:31, Tony Barbieri <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
PySide runs fine in 2.6 if that's what you mean. Might have to
compile it yourself though. Not sure what binaries they are
distributing.
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Sebastien Sterling
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
is pyside just a more up to date version of the version of
python currently supported by softimage ?
On 10 May 2013 02:36, Jeremie Passerin <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Ohh Nice !
On 9 May 2013 17:33, joshxsi <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
PySide is much more pythonic with data, strings etc
are just strings not QStrings.
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Differences_Between_PySide_and_PyQt
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Jeremie Passerin
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Can I ask what's the main differences between
PySide and PyQt4 ?
Is that just licensing ?
Jeremie
On 9 May 2013 17:04, Steven Caron
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hey Gang
Tony Barbieri and I have been working on
official support for PySide with the
PyQtForSoftimage plugin and I need some testers...
Who here wants to use PySide instead of PyQt4?
It is a little rough right now so, only people
that really want to use PySide should contact me.
Thanks
Steven
--
-tony
--
Signature
