This is a good observation Adrian, Cinefex should go more into detail.
P On 19/07/2013, at 11.49, adrian wyer <[email protected]> wrote: > agree that they are better kept in the office, great reference and good > reading while waiting for simulations/renders > > if you want back issues, i get mine from ebay, they're WAY cheaper than > direct from Cinefex..... > > the problem for me with Cinefex, was that they used to have VERY in depth > descriptions of HOW the cgi was done for a certain effect, these days it does > tend to be a bit "...and we did it in CG." not enough nerdy detail (for me > the very reason the mag exists!) > > a > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martijn Verkuil > Sent: 19 July 2013 06:58 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Cinefex > > I'm a subscriber. One of the few Softimage users I met in The Netherlands > told me about it when I ran into him on a comic convention. I immediately > took a subscription and I wanted to order a couple of those back issues but > the shipping costs were insane (no combined shipping discount). So I would be > interested in buying them if you could send them to Amsterdam, I'm sure the > actual shipping costs would be much lower than cinefex asks. Just ldrop me an > email what you've got for sale and if you're willing to send it to Amsterdam > > Cheers > Martijn > > Op 19 jul. 2013 01:36 schreef "David Gallagher" > <[email protected]> het volgende: > > Does anyone want about 17 old Cinefex's from early 2000s and late 1990s? > > Hate to just toss them, but... > > BTW, I haven't been seeing Cinefex around. Anyone reading it out there? > Dave G > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2013.0.3349 / Virus Database: 3204/6502 - Release Date: 07/18/13
