I'm sure the numbers are accurate. But I'm not sure how to interpret it though though, because Softimage Co was a subsidiary of Microsoft. and Microsoft spent a lottttttt of money for Softimage, more than Softimage by itself if it had been independent. example: spending hugely on siggraph. microsoft was rich and didn't care.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Stephen Blair <[email protected]> wrote: > I suppose they are as accurate as those in any of the other documents that > AVID filed with the SEC > http://1.usa.gov/1fv63a3 > > > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Chris Chia <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yea nice flashback... But how accurate are those figures? >> >> Chris >> >> >> On 28 Sep, 2013, at 12:28 AM, Luc-Eric Rousseau <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > 13, 22 and 32 million dollar loss. nice. >> > can't believe that stuff was public.. (can you really have >> > "flashbacks" about stuff you didn't know :P ) >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Greg Punchatz <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> 1? the one being ILM? >> >> >> >> In 1998, how many customers accounted for a little over 25% of >> >> Softimage >> >> revenue? -------------------------- To unsubscribe: mail [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe" and reply to the confirmation email.
