Looking over the numbers a little closer: While North America produced profits, they were marginal due to high cost of doing business. Europe produced about the same revenues, but had half the user base as they pay more for the product on average. Asia and Latin America were the real bang for buck bread winners. User base is roughly same size or slightly larger than for North America, but brought in more revenue because the cost paid for the product was higher.
If those numbers/ratios match today's numbers, it would explain why Softimage is being steered in its current direction. Matt -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matt Lind Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 11:01 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Friday Flashback #139 F) 1 Likely ILM. The real trivia is who was the 2nd customer accounting for the revenue the previous year? Matt -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Blair Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 7:25 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Friday Flashback #139 In 1998, how many customers accounted for a little over 25% of Softimage revenue? a) 100 b) 50 c) 25 d) 10 e) 5 f) 1 The answer might surprise some. Friday Flashback #139 In 1998, how many customers accounted for 27% of #Softimage revenue: 100,50,25,10,5, or 1? http://wp.me/powV4-2Rg -------------------------- To unsubscribe: mail [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with subject "unsubscribe" and reply to the confirmation email. -------------------------- To unsubscribe: mail [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with subject "unsubscribe" and reply to the confirmation email.
-------------------------- To unsubscribe: mail [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe" and reply to the confirmation email.
