Thanks for the explanation Luc-Eric. That is actually very useful
information to help balance out pester and bumping up of reported issues. =D


On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Matt Lind <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> Well good news, we deleted all the requests logged before 2009, so you
> don't
> >>have to worry about them.
>
> > Certainly explains a lot of things.  Why would you do something like
> that?
>
> Imagine the work involved in ordering a list of 12,000 items spanning
> a decade: it is not possible.  On a perfect day of triage, we could
> triage through about 40 incoming new items.   The development team at
> its peak had a fix rate below 20 items a week.   There is never a time
> when you "catch up" because there were more new bugs and requests
> logged a day than the team could work on in a week, never mind what's
> already logged.  it's simple math.
> We have to clean up bugs that are a few years old and unattended. And
> deal with the new ones shortly after they are logged, and that's
> either you do them this release, or you will never do them at all
> because new items will be coming in.
>
> It's real cute to pretend that "we have your bug from 2005".  Older
> bugs are not more valuable than the fresh ones just coming in.  You
> have to use holistic methods for dealing with that huge volume of
> data, and for non crash, non showstoppers issues - which you should
> address immediately - part of that is keeping the ears opened per area
> and looking at the items that come back again.
>
> So I've always encouraged people to re-log items. Some people have
> argued that people should first take a look at the list of already
> logged items and not relog item.  But an item not coming back from
> another users makes it low priority (there is no "plus one" counter)
> You constantly have to lobby the product team to attend to your
> issues, the bugs logged 3 or 4 years ago are not in a queue that's
> ever going to get shorter because there is new, fresh stuff coming up
> all the time and fires to put out all the time.
>



-- 




-=T=-

Reply via email to