Of course I meant one third of the costs for every tool, not three. And I used "thirds" as a term incorrectly. It was lost in translation. Sorry about that.
sven From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sven Constable Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 10:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Autodesk´s Sales model uhm, isn't he idea behind this model to cut any development costs by three thirds in particular and sell all three as one package for a higher price? And make it sound a good deal because costumers will get three tools instead of one even they don't need one or two of them? Maybe I do not comprehend here. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Daniel Brassard Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 9:16 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Autodesk´s Sales model It is this article and the current Softimage cross-grade offer that make me decide to take the jump to the Ultimate Suite. I am glad I did, I can now test plugins and shaders on the three platforms and do other things as well. And enough money left for some nice plugins or apps too. AD may have a smart thing going here, let's see what the future bring. On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Alan Fregtman <[email protected]> wrote: Did you read the whole thing? >From the article: "The plan is to shift customers away from single product purchases toward suites, and to move from buying perpetual licenses to acquiring software on long-term subscription or short-term rental." On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:56 PM, David Rivera <[email protected]> wrote: I came across this link: http://gfxspeak.com/2013/10/02/autodesk-sales-strategy-includes-discontinuin g-upgrade-purchases/ So what happened to the "rental" sales model? David R.
