Or lack of Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 Jan 2014, at 09:08, James De Colling <[email protected]> wrote: > > we use Maya primarily at our studio, but recently there has been a few > artists talking about modo and testing it out. they were very impressed, > however, most of the stuff they were showing me, or thought was impressive > was already standard workflow in softimage. > > but softimage isnt and never was on their radar. they had no idea. that's > marketing for you. > > >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Jordi Bares <[email protected]> wrote: >> Same here, every time I use maya I hate the experience and wonder myself his >> is it possible that it is still being used? >> >> The workflow is f@cked up you become miserable. >> >> I use Houdini mainly now although we will get Softimage very soon, wasting >> too much time for things Houdini is not good at. >> >> Jb >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 6 Jan 2014, at 08:52, Szabolcs Matefy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> So guys, I spent a weekend working with Maya…HOW THE F@CK THIS PROGRAM IS >>> USED IN PRODUCTION????????? >>> >>> >>> >>> Ok, I can use Maya, I have a quite solid background working with Maya, but >>> seriously guys…It’s so overcomplicated, and brainkilling…In Softimage >>> almost everything is just fine (OK, we need development), but in Maya, the >>> easiest task takes quite long compared to SI…Finally I found myself fixing >>> UVs, Unfolding, etc. in Softimage…Anyway, I need some samples in Maya, so I >>> take a big breath, and continue working with Maya…But seriously, Softimage >>> is way better in many point of view. It has no artisan, has no PaintFX, but >>> for example rendering is way faster (with MR), shading setup is way faster, >>> modeling is lot faster, and so on. So I really don’t understand, how come >>> that Softimage is not acknowledged at all. I swear guys, that I’ll spread >>> the Word of Softimage >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> >>> >>> Szabolcs >>> >>> >>> >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Henry Katz >>> Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2014 8:18 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: rumor, Soft dead within the next year >>> >>> >>> >>> Good thing I asked. >>> >>> On 01/04/2014 05:40 PM, Stephen Blair wrote: >>> >>> Softimage doesn't support Python 3.x >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Henry Katz <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Steve, >>> >>> No issues with python 3.3 as well, before I bruise my knuckles on the >>> bleeding edge? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Henry >>> On 01/03/2014 02:47 AM, Steven Caron wrote: >>> >>> really? >>> >>> >>> >>> install pyqt >>> >>> set softimage to use system python, uncheck... >>> file>preferences>scripting>use python installed with softimage >>> >>> run the example scripts pyqtforsoftimage plugin provides. or just 'import >>> PyQt4' >>> >>> >>> >>> s >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Angus Davidson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> A non nonsense guide to installing pYQT would be great. So many great tools >>> are never used because people cant get past trying to get the install to >>> work. >>> >
