Inclined to agree.
On 27 February 2014 00:10, Scott Parrish <[email protected]> wrote: > Again, I know! > > I just think the new upgrade policy is bullsh*%. > > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Graham Bell <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Well of course it's limited, because the upgrade policy itself is >> changing next year. >> >> From: [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Parrish >> Sent: 26 February 2014 22:39 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: new upgrade policy >> >> It's not news, no. But it is a pretty anti-consumer change in policy. >> The 70% discount is for a limited time only. >> >> It says right there in the FAQ: >> How can a customer get current if they have an older version of software >> after February 1, 2015? >> Customers who wish to use the latest release after February 1, 2015 will >> have the option to purchase the latest version at SRP (Suggested Retail >> Price). >> >> As a customer I'd like to be on paid maintenance because there is some >> sort of benefit that it provides. Not because there is a gun to my head >> that I lose my investment in purchasing the software and risk paying full >> price for upgrades in the future otherwise. >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Graham Bell <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> This isn't anything new, this has already been announced last year and >> discussed here and on other forums. >> Also currently, upgrade pricing is 70% of the price of a new seat. >> >> G >> >> From: [email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]> [mailto: >> [email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>] On Behalf Of Kris Rivel >> Sent: 26 February 2014 22:15 >> To: Softimage List >> Subject: Re: new upgrade policy >> >> I'm looking at Modo, Houdini and anything else with some drive, passion >> and inspiration behind it. I'll use Soft till it doesn't run anymore and >> just gives me a blue screen or something. >> >> But this aggressive tactic just comes off as greedy and is poorly >> planned. I wonder how many other holes they can put in their boat. >> >> Kris >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Sweeney <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>>> wrote: >> >> I am as quick as I can off the autodesk rollercoaster. A few things have >> made my choice I will always love soft and use the tool when its needed but >> I think I need to look for another avenue. Looking at modo? Thoughts?? >> >> Autodesk bollocks. >> On Feb 26, 2014 8:52 PM, "Kris Rivel" <[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>>> wrote: >> I read it and couldn't help but say WTH?! >> >> Kris >> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Emilio Hernandez <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>>> wrote: >> Seems they need to fill the vault... >> [http://img694.imageshack.us/img694/8965/erojamailpleca.jpg] >> >> 2014-02-26 14:29 GMT-06:00 Kris Rivel <[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]><mailto:[email protected]<mailto: >> [email protected]>>>: >> >> So...what's everyone's take on this gem? So if I don't upgrade to latest >> version now...then when I want that version I have to pay full price? >> >> >> http://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/autocad/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/Frequently-Asked-Questions-about-the-Autodesk-Upgrade-Policy.html >> >> Kris >> >> >> >> > -- www.matinai.com
