Will do, sorry if I sounded negative, hopefully only ignorant. :-)
Jordi Bares [email protected] On 27 Feb 2014, at 18:25, Paul Doyle <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jordi - I'd suggest joining our mailing list if you want to get into > things in more detail, I don't want to abuse my presence here - > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/creationplatform > > All I'll say is that the 2.0 release will make it a lot easier for TDs to get > going with Fabric, and there are some things cooking that should be of > interest. This covers the 2.0 stuff (https://vimeo.com/84300368) > > Cheers, > > Paul > > > On 27 February 2014 13:16, Jordi Bares <[email protected]> wrote: > I have the feeling I won't have the resources to build these kind of tools, > looks to me like you do tools for R&D which is great but we don't do R&D, in > fact, very few people do. > > Therefore I am looking at Fabric Engine with a lot of interest but I don't > picture it yet.. may be I simply don't get it yet and I am very happy you got > the MPC deal as surely you guys deserve it for the amazing technology you > have develop but I still don't see it. > > May be is simply the marketing needs to up its game? > > I would love to know a bit more about your roadmap because if I could fill > the gaps in Houdini with FE I would rather do that and keep a simpler > pipeline. > > thanks in advance Paul > > Jordi Bares > [email protected] > > On 27 Feb 2014, at 17:58, Paul Doyle <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 27 February 2014 12:54, Jordi Bares <[email protected]> wrote: >> Fabric Engine looks very promising but I wonder what their business model >> really is so I am quite cautious… The world is full of great ideas but if >> they don't make money that is the end of it. >> >> No idea what you're getting at here Jordi - we recently closed a global site >> license deal with MPC. Interested to understand what your concern is so I >> can address it... > >
