lol not at all - I appreciate the candour

On 27 February 2014 13:35, Jordi Bares <[email protected]> wrote:

> Will do, sorry if I sounded negative, hopefully only ignorant.
>
> :-)
>
>  Jordi Bares
> [email protected]
>
> On 27 Feb 2014, at 18:25, Paul Doyle <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Jordi - I'd suggest joining our mailing list if you want to get into
> things in more detail, I don't want to abuse my presence here -
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/creationplatform
>
> All I'll say is that the 2.0 release will make it a lot easier for TDs to
> get going with Fabric, and there are some things cooking that should be of
> interest. This covers the 2.0 stuff (https://vimeo.com/84300368)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 27 February 2014 13:16, Jordi Bares <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I have the feeling I won't have the resources to build these kind of
>> tools, looks to me like you do tools for R&D which is great but we don't do
>> R&D, in fact, very few people do.
>>
>> Therefore I am looking at Fabric Engine with a lot of interest but I
>> don't picture it yet.. may be I simply don't get it yet and I am very happy
>> you got the MPC deal as surely you guys deserve it for the amazing
>> technology you have develop but I still don't see it.
>>
>> May be is simply the marketing needs to up its game?
>>
>> I would love to know a bit more about your roadmap because if I could
>> fill the gaps in Houdini with FE I would rather do that and keep a simpler
>> pipeline.
>>
>> thanks in advance Paul
>>
>>  Jordi Bares
>> [email protected]
>>
>> On 27 Feb 2014, at 17:58, Paul Doyle <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 27 February 2014 12:54, Jordi Bares <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Fabric Engine looks very promising but I wonder what their business
>>> model really is so I am quite cautious... The world is full of great ideas
>>> but if they don't make money that is the end of it.
>>
>>
>> No idea what you're getting at here Jordi - we recently closed a global
>> site license deal with MPC. Interested to understand what your concern is
>> so I can address it...
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to