Wow!  I guess I haven't kept up with Modo at all.  

It does look pretty appealing.






—
Sent from Mailbox for iPad

On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:47 PM, David Rivera
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, please I´m into the webinar. I recently saw this:
> https://vimeo.com/76876920 and I´m picturing myself adding more "modo 
> mentality" asap :)
> Thanks. 
> David R.
> On Thursday, March 6, 2014 2:01 PM, Nic Sievers <[email protected]> wrote:
>  
> Count me in as well
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Sebastien Sterling 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Webinar sounds cool would love to hear where things are going
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On 6 March 2014 18:54, Maurício PC <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>I'm also in for the webinar. Brads webinar are always fun and he can convey 
>>and express himself really well. Looking forward to it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Michael Clarke <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>Count me in for the webinar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Very interested to see what could become of the package if it has some 
>>>>customer-focused dedication behind it.  
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I suspect my strategy at this point shared by a number of other users. I'll 
>>>>continue to use SI and take the Maya path for the moment. The real decision 
>>>>will be whether to continue with maintenance or to continue to use SI (an 
>>>>probably Maya) without a viable upgrade path. Either way, i am going to be 
>>>>looking for a package to fill in some gaps and MODO looks like a reasonably 
>>>>priced quality alternative with a future. If in two years it looks like it 
>>>>could one day be a truly complete app comparable to AD's offerings, then 
>>>>the decision to cut ties with AD becomes less difficult. Up until that 
>>>>point — and as some have pointed out already, several years beyond, — SI 
>>>>will remain a functional tool capable of handling most of my needs. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>MODO can at minimum be something of a stopgap to hedge the risks. It looks 
>>>>like fairly low cost way of providing a buffer to the current dilemma.  
>>>>It's value as a supplemental tool is worth looking into, whether or not it 
>>>>ever becomes a primary production tool. The whole relationship with The 
>>>>Foundry feels good at this point.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>One more thing. AD had some great people working there, and most of the 
>>>>folks who interacted with customers were extremely dedicated and helpful. 
>>>>What I always sensed from them, however, was a disconnect between the 
>>>>support and development teams, and the decision makers within the company. 
>>>>That's something smaller companies like LUX/Foundry can handle differently. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I'm not looking for MODO to become my primary tool. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Mar 6, 2014, at 12:09 PM, Eugen Sares <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>In for that webinar, too...
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>------ Originalnachricht ------
>>>>>Von: "Tim Crowson" <[email protected]>
>>>>>An: [email protected]
>>>>>Gesendet: 06.03.2014 19:01:30
>>>>>Betreff: Re: Luxology Modo 50% off for this mailing list - A new word from 
>>>>>Brad Peebler
>>>>> 
>>>>>Yes there is. Not much of a secret anymore....  :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-Tim
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On 3/6/2014 11:55 AM, Paul Griswold wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh don't get me started on the history of Modo - it'll totally derail 
>>>>>>things.  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm an old-time Lightwave beta tester from the early-mid 1990's.  Brad 
>>>>>>>Peebler was my contact at NewTek back in those days.  There's a whole 
>>>>>>>drama around how Modo came about.
>>>>>>>ᐧ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Tim Crowson 
>>>>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Mmm.... Paul I think you're getting close to the genetic fallacy with 
>>>>>>>that. Also I'm not sure Modo was ever intended to replace Lightwave. 
>>>>>>>Maybe, just not sure...?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I think your point about opening things up the way ICE does is an 
>>>>>>>>important distinction to make though. ICE is a platform, not just 
>>>>>>>>series of tools to meet specific needs. As such, it shares a room with 
>>>>>>>>very few systems (Houdini, Maya internally as I understand...). But the 
>>>>>>>>vast majority of 3D applications out there, including Softimage (minus 
>>>>>>>>ICE), are built to address specific, known production needs. I don't 
>>>>>>>>think it's fair to criticize the choice to design an application this 
>>>>>>>>way, simply because such a design choice indicates that the developer 
>>>>>>>>is trying to meet artists' known needs. Certainly there's absolutely no 
>>>>>>>>denying the power and flexibility of a platform like ICE/Houdini, which 
>>>>>>>>essentially opens up a layer between the raw API and the immediate 
>>>>>>>>toolset exposed to the user, allowing them to create new tools via 
>>>>>>>>node-based programming. But if that'sall we had, I doubt many of us 
>>>>>>>>could get our work done on time. Most of us still need
>  traditional, focused toolsets as well.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>As for Modo, people are going to have to take the responsibility of 
>>>>>>>>doing their own due diligence in evaluating it. There's no definite 
>>>>>>>>answer to 'can it replace Softimage?' That's silly. It just depends on 
>>>>>>>>what your needs are, like everything else. In its current state and 
>>>>>>>>because of our pipeline here at Magnetic, I use Modo primarily as a 
>>>>>>>>swiss army knife. Just yesterday I was able to load in an illustrator 
>>>>>>>>file with complicated curves into Modo, set them to be renderable, then 
>>>>>>>>bake that geometry cache into something I could export (rims all around 
>>>>>>>>these intricate designs on a stained glass window). Could not have done 
>>>>>>>>that nearly as easily otherwise, not by a mile. Took me 30s in Modo.  
>>>>>>>>Stuff like that is a stress relief for me!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Anyway, I would LOVE to see a truly procedural platform like ICE come 
>>>>>>>>to Modo.. Who wouldn't?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>-Tim
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On 3/6/2014 11:25 AM, Paul Griswold wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Well Modo is essentially Lightwave Part 2, since it came from the 
>>>>>>>>original programmers of Lightwave and at one point was supposed to 
>>>>>>>>replace Lightwave.  I feel like they tend to want to build specific 
>>>>>>>>tools to fill specific needs instead of opening things up the way ICE 
>>>>>>>>does. 
>>>>>>>>>ᐧ
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Sebastien Sterling 
>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Lightwave mentality Paul ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On 6 March 2014 17:07, Paul Griswold 
>>>>>>>>>><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I'd love to sit in on a webinar.  Modo scares me a little bit in that 
>>>>>>>>>>they still seem to have the LW mentality there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>-Paul
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>ᐧ
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Chris Johnson <[email protected]> 
>>>>>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>I'm in for the Webinar. and what is the contact information again to 
>>>>>>>>>>>e-mail him directly?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Tim Crowson 
>>>>>>>>>>>><[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>More contact from Brad off-list..... He says the following...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I've been thinking about how this all went down and I'm feeling a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>bit sad about it. I have a new idea. People should not feel like 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>they have to rush to make a move. They don't! Soft is still 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>awesome and will be for years to come. Rather than offering 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>another promo code what I would like to do is offer an extended 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>trial of MODO for anyone who wants it. They can contact me 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>directly and I'll get them setup with a 60 day license. My offer 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>still stands that anyone who talks to me directly will also find 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>that I am a man of my word (with regard to the code). Wink wink. I 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>can't publicly extend that offer but I will stand by it for anyone 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>on that list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I would also be willing to set up an invitation only webinar for 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the list so we can talk openly under a "gentlemens NDA". I'd love 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>to clear up some of the confusion about MODO being built as a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>modeler only and share some short, mid and long term goals for the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>product. Finally, I'm getting quite a bit of email this week so if 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>someone doesn't hear from me straight away please feel free to 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>send your email again. I won't be offended to get spammed. :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>If you guys are interested in taking him up in his webinar idea, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>please voice it! I'm pretty sure he can read these messages on the 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Google group, but if not I'm happy to convey your corporate 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>-Tim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>-- 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-- 
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>________________________________
>>>>> 
>>>>> Diese E-Mail ist frei von Viren und Malware, denn der avast! Antivirus 
>>>>> Schutz ist aktiv. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Michael Clarke Design
>>>>Blue C Studios
>>>>713-927-9835 
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>
>>>gonebadfx.com
>>>- your source for bad fx
>>

Reply via email to