The idea of prewarnings, is for exactly that.. letting bigger shops in
to the decision & start transitions first,
gives a feeling of preferential treatment, & not much room to dissaprove
when it all silent and top secret, so you go ahead saying..
"darn, but what other choice?"
And when it all comes out, not only do the prewarned (with the loudest
voices) not speak-out (already transitioned halfway)
but then serve as example leaders, more-or-less willingly leading the
way to the "better" way!
Yay!
On 03/17/14 13:53, Chris Marshall wrote:
Just to be clear here, the only reason Glassworks have been the only
big name co to voice their concerns, is because all the others knew
this was coming?
And also just to be clear, the comment from Maurice Patel "Our plans
included pre-briefing Softimage customers with a significant ongoing
investment in our software prior to the March 4..."
This refers to companys with a "significant ongoing investment", which
is basically talking about company's most valuable to AD. Can they not
see that Softimage is used by an extremely broad user base because it
is a one stop solution. My company is small, but it's investment in
Softimage is as significant as any of the big facilities in that
it's future relies on Softimage. But in terms of how valuable my
company is to Autodesk, then that's become pretty clear.
I'm feeling more angry by the minute!
--
Chris Marshall
Mint Motion Limited
029 20 37 27 57
07730 533 115
www.mintmotion.co.uk <http://www.mintmotion.co.uk>
