The company is 110% focused on getting Wildstar to market on our advertised 
release date of June 3, 2014.  That's not too far off, so you can imagine where 
our heads are at right now.

I cannot speak for the company, but if it were up to me I'd wait for the sales 
numbers to roll in to determine if transition is even an issue.

Matt





From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Meng-Yang Lu
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:20 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Autodesk response

Matt,

Considering your previous emails about retaining legacy, I got the notion you 
didn't know until the last minute since you were still writing emails about 
date integrity.

What are you guys planning to do?

-Lu

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Matt Lind 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
In response to 'B', Autodesk showed up at our office the very moment the news 
went live to everybody else.  In essence, we didn't get any warning either. We 
were told we're one of the larger Softimage customers.

No NDA's, roadmaps to the future, or anything else.  Just, "Hey, Soft is EOL.  
We'll toss you some Max and/or Maya licenses at no extra cost to help you along 
for the next 2 years, after which you can no longer use Soft.   Any 
questions?".   This is before the policy of ending use of Softimage after Feb 
1, 2016 was revised, of course.


Matt




From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of Raffaele Fragapane
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 3:44 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Autodesk response

Lets make something very clear here.
A) big shops might not be voicing their concerns for reasons other than some of 
the utterly retarded conspiracy theories that are emerging. Reasons might be 
that CEOs and producers in a place big enough simply DO NOT give enough of a 
damn about this, or that they are not a bunch of fanatics but they deal with 
business the way business is dealt with, or even that it's not infrequent for 
shops having a "no vendor bias" policy which extends to publicity, positive or 
negative, of any kind tied to a specific vendor.

B) the forewarning was a small handful of weeks for the luckiest, as short as 
10 days for those at the end of it, and many were simply left out out of sheer 
incompetence (See Glassworks).

C) the shops you mention might be considering to flip the finger to AD as well. 
As usual I can't speak for, or even imply what is going on in, Animal Logic, 
but I know first hand that more than a place was already trying their absolute 
hardest to marginalize as much as possible integration of AD products. Do you 
think how this latest move was handled is helping?

D) Last but not least, I don't know where this dysfunctional theory some people 
seem to have that big shops get bribed by vendors to promote things to the 
peons. Sure, it sporadically happened in the past, especially in SGI days, but 
ultimately the margins in VFX and Feature Animation are so small you have no 
idea. The singular sole priority in any big shop is to work as efficiently as 
possible financially. If it involves using AD products AD itself could be 
helmed by Satan and have a side-trade of illegal arms contraband and AD 
products would still be bought.
If working with AD is potentially financially damaging, given how small the 
cost of software itself in a pipe is these days when the pipe is wide and long 
enough, many birds would be instantaneously flipped at AD.

Honestly guys, get a grip. There's no conspiracy theory, just some people are a 
lot more rational and more divested across resources than those frothing over 
it. It doesn't mean they aren't saddened, or suddenly even more concerned about 
AD's client policies, but they don't all have XSI tattoos on their buttocks.

On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Jason S 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The idea of prewarnings, is for exactly that.. letting bigger shops in to the 
decision & start transitions first,
gives a feeling of preferential treatment, & not much room to dissaprove when 
it all silent and top secret, so you go ahead saying..
"darn, but what other choice?"

And when it all comes out, not only do the prewarned (with the loudest voices) 
not speak-out (already transitioned halfway)

but then serve as example leaders, more-or-less willingly leading the way to 
the "better" way!

Yay!


Reply via email to