On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Ponthieux, Joseph G. (LARC-E1A)[LITES] <[email protected]> wrote: > Am I to understand that AD thinks that those people who refused to be > subjected to AD's unreasonable penalties for lapse in maintenance are > somehow to blame for Softimage's demise?
gosh, no, that's not what that quote says. At this point people are just making up their own article > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dan Yargici > Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 11:28 AM > To: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Autodesk response > > > > "For example, only a small proportion of our Softimage customers are > actually current on the Softimage software. Many are using older versions. > These customers will be able to continue to do so in perpetuity. Given that > they are productive using older versions of the software, this decision > should not significantly impact that productivity. For customers who have > built their production capacity around staying current with our releases > there are several options including locking their pipelines on Softimage > 2015 indefinitely or transitioning to a Maya or 3ds Max pipeline." > > > > These people are not happy they're still on older versions, it's the > stagnation of development under Autodesk that's kept them there. I'm sorry, > but this is a shameful misrepresentation of the facts, Maurice. > > > > DAN > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:24 PM, David Saber <[email protected]> wrote: > > That's not a response to the open letters. No word about how XSI is an asset > in production thanks to its fast workflow, and how Autodesk intends to find > a replacement. Once again, Softimage is NOT only ICE, so bifrost cannot be a > replacement for Softimage. > >
