|
Hi Stefan, If I can criticize your criticism, It does bring-up a number of not so great things about some clearly unfair behavior. Yet the piece proposes a very "unconstructive" form of criticism (just by the title itself, and the general tone), While becoming angry -can- be a good thing (if not essential) when faced with situations that can be seen as not right, there should be a clear distinction between firmly voicing disapproval, and sheer lashing out. (the latter being well on the counter-productive side) Calling people liars, incompetent or painting an entire organization as a desease or cancer.. .. and you stated, "It was also the very first time I saw professionals use amounts of profanity on the list, in volume. " And when speaking about the (very) partial reversal, "The latter only came about after violent outbursts from the Softimage users, and rightly so." I would argue that (thankfully) most criticism put forth here up-til the reversal or otherwise, has been firm, respectful, thoughtful, fair and specific. (for the very large majority of the volume) Otherwise welcome back! :) On 03/19/14 5:04, [email protected] wrote:
|
- Ancient lurker's response to the current developments si
- Re: Ancient lurker's response to the current dev... Cristobal Infante
- Re: Ancient lurker's response to the current... Octavian Ureche
- Re: Ancient lurker's response to the current dev... Jason S
- Re: Ancient lurker's response to the current... Luc-Eric Rousseau
- Re: Ancient lurker's response to the cur... John Richard Sanchez

