Lol, yeah Adam, it would be funny to have a Softimage booth, showing of the
Latest from Mootz and LK, Pooby and exocortec, not to mention Fabric
integration. a healthy roaster of artists like David.

Press wondering, ..."but aren't you dead ?"

AD staff steaming silently in the corner "Why Won't you DIE !"


On 19 March 2014 19:52, Adam Sale <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think it would be great to have a Siggraph presence where we have a
> lineup of Soft artists showing exactly what you mentioned Dave.
>
> Can't do this kind of scenarios, where even if you can do it in Maya, show
> how much longer it takes.
>
> With all of the attention being given the EOL of Soft, people might be
> interested in seeing what all the noise is about.
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:48 PM, olivier jeannel <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>>  I'm not fan of the idea.
>> Frankly there's tons of tutorial in Maya already. If someone want's to
>> transition, there are  a lot of material to train with.
>> As already said, no need to try to work the same workflow in another app,
>> it's different.
>>
>> Here, it's more "Give us some cool hint so we can copy them" .That's the
>> whole thing since the "anouncement".
>> "Give us your top 5", "what"s the 80% ice nodes..."
>>
>> Last thing I want to do is help AD in any way. I mean, nothing against
>> the users, but frankly now you want to help AD make more money.
>>
>> AD, Give us the ability to continue to buy seats, in exchange we show you.
>>
>> I'm bad, my mother told me ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 19/03/2014 20:35, Bk a écrit :
>>
>> I'd love for AD to agree to a " First get an expert to do it in Softimage
>> and get an expert do it in Maya" comparitive workflow video series.
>>  It would be most entertaining.
>> Especially when you start bringing ice into the equation. Ive had some
>> experience of this before. One notable occasion went  Me in ice -30 mins..
>> 2 guys in Maya- a week and a half, but to be fair, they would usually
>> achieve things in under a week.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19 Mar 2014, at 19:22, Nicolas Esposito <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>   I asked directly to Maurice to do some videos to compare the workflow
>> of a single task using Softimage and Maya, similar to what Emilio Hernandez
>> did for the Dorrito technique
>>
>>  I really hope that they'll do that because right now I want to know how
>> the workflow will change
>>
>>  By the way, on the area blog there's no Softimage 2015 announcement...
>>
>>  Jesus...even with all those request and question they just don't care
>> about Softimage, not even a single line...except the farewell from Mark
>> Schnnoegel
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-19 19:55 GMT+01:00 Paulo César Duarte <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> What I don't understand is how they want me to make the transition to a 
>>> software
>>> that doesn't have the tools that I used before? Such as ICE mainly, in
>>> Max or Maya 2015 I won't have my workflow again, so there is no
>>> transition.
>>>
>>>  I will continue using Softimage as long as I can, and complement with
>>> Houdini, Modo or Blender when necessary... because these softwares are
>>> those that more listen to your users, and that is the future for me.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-03-19 14:23 GMT-03:00 David Rivera <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>
>>>   So I head onto:
>>>> http://area.autodesk.com/products/features/softimage , right? and I
>>>> skipped intro (in a 1 hour lenght video, skipping intro
>>>> is going straight to the middle, after all the "verbose"). So what
>>>> they´re doing? Talking about maya in a softimage video.
>>>>
>>>>  Quitted. Closed the tab on browser. Go on with my life.
>>>>  Now I´m pissed, because at the "last announcement" there wasn´t even
>>>> a word of consideration for 15 years career on softimage.
>>>>  Not even an apology for taking away the the one thing that supports
>>>> families and pays bills...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *David Rivera*
>>>> *3D Compositor/Animator*
>>>> LinkedIN <http://ec.linkedin.com/in/3dcinetv>
>>>> Behance <https://www.behance.net/3dcinetv>
>>>> VFX Reel <https://vimeo.com/70551635>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> www.pauloduarte.ws
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to