That's a joke right? I mean for the Most Requested Feature?... was another
plugin? !!!


On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Sebastien Sterling <
sebastien.sterl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Turns out the "MOST REQUESTED FEATURE" for Max 2015, was a 30$ plugin
> http://www.vg2max.spb.ru/edgechex.htm
>
>
> and looks like new Layer system and schematic nodel view was also third
> party tech https://vimeo.com/57075455
>
>
> On 19 March 2014 07:26, Sebastien Sterling 
> <sebastien.sterl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> It's just slow, they may have improved the viewport performance but its
>> just slow, the constraints are slow.
>>
>>
>> On 19 March 2014 07:13, Szabolcs Matefy <szabol...@crytek.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hehe my PC is in good condition, and frankly has no problem with any
>>> other software, but Max. Only with Max.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
>>> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] *On Behalf Of *Alexander
>>> Akbarov
>>> *Sent:* Monday, March 17, 2014 1:07 PM
>>> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: Why MAX is not option for me.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If Max crashes "about 5 times in an hour" there is definitely something
>>> wrong  with your PC. Max is shitty, old and awkward especially after using
>>> XSI, but it's very good for archviz. And its is pretty universal because of
>>> myriads plug-ins many of them much better than Max itself...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-03-17 11:26 GMT+02:00 Raffaele Fragapane <
>>> raffsxsil...@googlemail.com>:
>>>
>>> Max is a well known  Frankenstein monster that's only survived this long
>>> because it has a ridiculous installed user base.
>>> I don't think anybody on this list would have ever have considered it.
>>> Even the game market has been trying as hard as they possibly can to move
>>> away from it despite a massive market pull.
>>>
>>> It's almost literally the exact opposite of soft in every regard, from
>>> its history to it's identity.
>>> Can't honestly blame AD for keeping that one alive though, it brings
>>> cash in with a "ducking" rake.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to