Thanks Gerbrand

On 20 August 2014 14:39, Jason S <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Lol! Yeah I know I parethesise lots   :)
>
>
> On 08/20/14 9:04, Francois Lord wrote:
>
> Hey Jason, have you been programming in Lisp lately?
> Just askin'.
> ;)
>
> On 20-Aug-14 01:05, Jason S wrote:
>
>
> As mentionned, I may totally be disproven,
> (especially with the all the expectation for it to be at least ICE (or
> more) )
>
> And to be honest, while being fully aware that many dedicated people
> including yourself are working hard to make Bifrost something great,
> (which is the main thing that I'm sure will make it at least very good)
> I must admit that despite that, I -do- wish it would somewhat more or less
> 'fail' just enough for the floor to be, lets say "freed-up" (in a
> non-aggressive/non-invasive way) for other players also making great things
> to have a shot, but while not being completely bent on having the entire
> floor for themselves.
>
> Cause as it stands now, it could very well be the case that good or less
> good, there would just not be any comparison base, or any (remaining)
> choices to choose from, like it can arguably be (already) the case today.
> (being -clearly- not out of mere circumstance or (at-all) achieved with
> means that anyone (except AD) would identify as being -fair- or
> 'non-destructive')
>
> And if hoping for an outcome (with diversity) is being delusional,
> (which I hardly think it is)  then may that be as it may.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to