I have a 970 for my home system and it's fantastic.

-Tim


On 12/11/2014 3:34 PM, David Rivera wrote:
GTX 9XX it´s the way to go, packed with another $600 on Redshift.
Thanks. :)
*David Rivera*
/3D Compositor/Animator/
LinkedIN <http://ec.linkedin.com/in/3dcinetv>
Behance <https://www.behance.net/3dcinetv>
VFX Reel <https://vimeo.com/70551635>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]>
*To:* "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Thursday, December 11, 2014 2:32 PM
*Subject:* Re: Best graphic card for Softimage?

"How long can you can your computer on with this card in it?"

Sry but clarification please?

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:28 PM, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    How long can you can your computer on with this card in it?
    On 2014-12-11 05:36, Mario Reitbauer wrote:
    Got the msi gtx 970 gaming 4g.
    Quite happy with it.

    2014-12-11 10:03 GMT+01:00 Mirko Jankovic
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>:

        right now 970 is best bang for backs.
        they do not heat too much, power consumption is prety low and
        they do really good job.
        and on top of that Redshift as perfect companion ;)
        viewport performance is not that big issue at all between two
        cards but being able to utilise GPU rendering with CUDA is
        way more higher on the list then couple more FPS in viewport

        On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Christoph Muetze
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            I'd stay clear of the ATI/AMD consumer cards if I were
            you. From our
            experience Soft becomes generally less stable (crashing a
            lot more), and
            the raycast selection is going haywire sometimes.

            Chris

            On 11/12/14 04:44, phil harbath wrote:
            > I went Redshift and have been very pleased.  I can get
            by using a lot less computers than before on most
            projects,  volume smoke is pretty much all I use MR for
            anymore.   I have several computers with a combination of
            780TI, 770, and 970, while I think the 780Ti give the
            best performance, it really makes more sense to buy the
            970 as they are priced better or 980 if you have more
            cash.  The Redshift say go with the cards with the most
            ram (that would be Titan 6tb, if you got even more cash),
            depends on your needs of course.
            >
            > From: David Rivera
            > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:51 PM
            > To: Softimage Mailing List
            > Subject: Best graphic card for Softimage?
            >
            > I know this subject has been posted a lot over the
            years, but it happens that I read a benchmark performance
            between autodesk products on certain webpage. They tested
            Radeons vs Nvidias and turns out that Mudbox and
            Softimage ran better on AMD (Radeons) - this is mental
            ray render.
            >
            >
            > So I was wondering whether to go full on mental ray
            (CPU) or take my savings and put it on a GPU renderer?
            Either case, now a days, which is the middle ranked
            graphic card for softimage? (My budget is around 1k).
            >
            >
            > Thanks.
            >
            > David Rivera
            > 3D Compositor/Animator
            > LinkedIN
            > Behance
            > VFX Reel
            >





--
Signature


Reply via email to