I like fusión. Node based compositing is much more flexible and easier to grasp
when it comes to layers. AE, unless you start getting into programming and hard
to visualize constrained parameters between layers.... it doesn't cut it like
node based compositing.
As a feature set I like Nuke. Fusion is great but it doesn't have math nodes.
To be honest I really enjoyed compositing in Blender. It has math nodes so you
can build you're own compositing systems from the ground up if needs be and the
node workflow add-on is really fun. Some of the best node workflows I know....
The only downside is that it's slow to render - not terribly optimized. But
another up on it is that you can have all different compositions in the same
file and they all can reference into the video editor it has so you can preview
the edit and then tweak accordingly without having dozens of comps open. Also
it's DOF node is excellent (better than Fusions imho). As a 3D space... unlike
the others where 3D was built around the compositing.. this was built the other
way around..... shame it's so slow to crunch frames.
-------- Original message --------
From: Scott Lange <[email protected]>
Date: 27/05/2016 10:23 (GMT-05:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Compositing app choice
Gotcha. From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Greg Punchatz
Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 11:10 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Compositing app choice AE is good for motion graphics but not so
good for comping... IMHO On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Scott Lange
<[email protected]> wrote:So No one uses After Effects anymore?
------
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to [email protected] with
"unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
