Hey Lyle,

I am not sure if you remeber me from the LowFer days
when I was A3O?... Anyways are you using PowerSDR as
the "software" to drive the printer port? I just got
my Softrock rx/tx 6.2 Xmitting on 160 meters thru my
Alpha 76 I am seeing 70 watts!

Thanks

Mike
--- "Lyle Koehler, K0LR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm happy to report that my Lite+Xtall v8.3 receiver
> kit is up and
> running, both with the 12F683 on-board controller
> and with a
> "modification" to allow parallel-port control.
> Actually no
> modification to the v8.3 board is required -- the
> parallel-port
> control interface is on an 8-pin header that gets
> plugged into the
> socket in place of the 12F683. In addition to the
> header, the only
> components required are two FETs and a DB25
> connector. A schematic of
> the interface is included in Guido's PowerSDR-sr40
> Installation Manual
> (http://powersdr-sr40.sourceforge.net/). I used
> 2N7000 transistors in
> place of the BS170 parts shown in Guido's diagram.
> The 10k pullup
> resistors R1 and R2 are not required, because there
> are already
> pullups on the v8.3 board. Here is a verbal
> description of the
> interface wiring which will have to suffice until I
> get around to
> posting a diagram to the Files section.
> 
> The source leads of both FETs are tied to ground
> (pin 8 of the
> header). One FET has its drain connected to pin 2 of
> the header and
> its gate going to pin 3 of the DB25 connector. The
> other FET has its
> drain connected to pin 3 of the header and the gate
> tied to pin 2 of
> the DB25 connector. Pins 12, 13 and 25 of the DB25
> connector are
> connected to pin 8 of the header.
> 
> With the 80/40 BPF filter board plugged into the
> v8.3, I'm able to
> listen anywhere on 80 or 40 and to everything in
> between, using
> PowerSDR-sr40. In addition, I can check WWV at 10
> MHz or listen to the
> stronger AM broadcast stations. So far the 80/40 BPF
> is the only one
> I've completed, but conditions on all the bands are
> lousy today anyway1
> 
> Lyle, K0LR
> 
> 



      

Reply via email to