On 09/14/2016 01:22 PM, Matthieu Huin wrote: > I'm afraid it might be abused, how about having a rule to disable testing if > workflow is set to -1 (which would be the default value when initially > submitting a patch) ? Thus it would prevent accidental merging of untested > code. > Well if Skip CI means there is no Verified vote, then wouldn't be not abusable ? -Tristan
> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Fabien Boucher" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 2:55:11 PM >> Subject: [Softwarefactory-dev] Skip test jobs if "Skip CI" string appears in >> the commit msg >> >> Hi, >> >> Just an idea and wanted to know if we should create a story for that. >> When working on something that just a WIP and you want to push on Gerrit >> to not lose your work in case of local outage you are usually not interested >> by the CI test results. So instead of consuming resources for nothing it is >> maybe better to be able say the CI to not run any tests for a change. >> >> WDYT ? >> >> Fabien >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwarefactory-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > Softwarefactory-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Softwarefactory-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev
