Le 14/09/2016 à 16:48, Tristan Cacqueray a écrit : > On 09/14/2016 12:55 PM, Fabien Boucher wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Just an idea and wanted to know if we should create a story for that. >> When working on something that just a WIP and you want to push on Gerrit >> to not lose your work in case of local outage you are usually not interested >> by the CI test results. So instead of consuming resources for nothing it is >> maybe better to be able say the CI to not run any tests for a change. >> >> WDYT ? >> >> Fabien >> > > +1, I also like to submit half baked patch that doesn't need a CI run. > Perhaps using a Skip-CI file we could easily catch with current zuul > filtering capability would be easier to implement ? > > -Tristan >
Well looking at the pipeline level configuration I'm not sure we can match on something related to the files of a change. Checking the content of the commit message is something we already do (eg. recheck). A reject rule can be added to the check and the gate pipeline in addition to the require condition ? > > _______________________________________________ > Softwarefactory-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev > _______________________________________________ Softwarefactory-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/softwarefactory-dev
