On 2009-02-18 17:20, David W. Hankins wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 03:45:45PM +1300, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> Wouldn't you want a short overlap to allow seamless migration >> of application sessions? Break-before-make is not good for >> real time streams or for any kind of QOS assurance. > > I think two Softwires endpoints will cover different IPv4 address > ranges on the 'external' side of the CGN. So even make-before-break > would not provide what you are looking for?
Actually, wouldn't it allow a clever NAT to update session state automatically? In any case, we can't be sure that this is the only usage scenario for ever. Brian _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
