On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:44:22AM -0700, Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote: > I suggest to change in the draft the reference from > "draft-droms-softwires-snat-01" to the new > "draft-ietf-softwire-dual-stack-lite-00". > > and to name the option : OPTION_DSLITE.
I agree. I admit I hadn't thought about the name before, but you're
the second person to catch me on the reference mistake, I need to
update that.
Would you object to 'OPTION_DS_LITE'? I am thinking about this from
how we usually translate RFC option names into configuration parameter
names;
option dhcp6.dslite foo.example.com;
option dhcp6.ds-lite foo.example.com;
option dhcp6.dual-stack-lite foo.example.com;
I'm leaning towards the middle one.
I hope there is no confusion with;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nintendo_DS_Lite
Or perhaps this is an RFC 5241 opportunity?
--
David W. Hankins "If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. -- Jack T. Hankins
pgpXiPNIAnQlC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
