Hi Hui, I think Sri has a point. Why we want an v4 app communicates to a future v6-only app host-to-host? If we start doing this, we will discourage the v4 apps to migrate to v6. Isn't it against what we want the applications to migrate to v6?
Thanks, Yiu On 12/1/09 10:21 AM, "Hui Deng" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Alain and Sri, > > Based on previous discussion with you two, > I found there is a fundamental mis-understanding about our requirement. > > Back to last Behave working group meeting, I personally think that I > presented clearly about our > scenario and requirement about host to host communication is about v4 > appliation (host A) talk with v6 application (host B). > > I try to figure out what you would like to propose about v4-v4 during > that meeting with you in this list. > But anyhow, could you help to explain how your proposal could work in > our requirement and scenarios, > > Many thanks > > -Hui > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
