Hi, Yiu, I replied in his email, thanks for your remindness. our key is that we need support developers.
thanks -Hui 2009/12/3 Lee, Yiu <[email protected]>: > Hi Hui, > > I think Sri has a point. Why we want an v4 app communicates to a future > v6-only app host-to-host? If we start doing this, we will discourage the v4 > apps to migrate to v6. Isn't it against what we want the applications to > migrate to v6? > > Thanks, > Yiu > > > On 12/1/09 10:21 AM, "Hui Deng" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Dear Alain and Sri, >> >> Based on previous discussion with you two, >> I found there is a fundamental mis-understanding about our requirement. >> >> Back to last Behave working group meeting, I personally think that I >> presented clearly about our >> scenario and requirement about host to host communication is about v4 >> appliation (host A) talk with v6 application (host B). >> >> I try to figure out what you would like to propose about v4-v4 during >> that meeting with you in this list. >> But anyhow, could you help to explain how your proposal could work in >> our requirement and scenarios, >> >> Many thanks >> >> -Hui >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
