> > Alain wrote in his mail which I quote here:
> >
> > In our case, we have:
> >
> > * many millions of edge devices (similar to your UE)
> > * thousands of routers
> > * thousands of servers
> >
> > So your mileage with DS-Lite varies according to how much your network fits
> into the above proportions. If you exactly have the above, DS-Lite fits you
> best.
> >
>
> Nope, that does not sound like 3GPP mobile. 3GPP architecture is
> completely based on tunneling. The only devices that need IPv6
> addresses or IPv6 routing capability are the UEs and the GGSN, and we
> have support in those devices today.
This is what I meant, in 3GPP mobile you don't have millions of home routers
that need IPv6 addresses.
I think we are agreeing on this.
> I am not sure what your conclusion is, given that your facts regarding
> base stations (do you mean BTS? NodeB?) and backhaul are not correct.
If we can get them do IPv6, it would even be better, I think.
> I frankly don't think DS-lite works well for mobile,
I don't want to put it this way, as I said it is easy to deploy DS-Lite in
mobile, maybe except for AFTR box.
Regards,
Behcet
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
