Hi Hui, Sure. To close this thread, its rather much more simpler to enable IPv6 on the end-hosts first and let the applications use that stack natively, and not use a psuedo IPv4 transport with a re-written host stack. Believe me, its not prolonging IPv4 life, but is enabling faster IPv6 migration still keeping some sensible and manageable host stacks. Thanks for the discussion. I will wait for others comments on impact to codecs due to the use of the IPv6 sockets.
Regards Sri On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Hui Deng wrote:
Hi Sri, My purpose here is just discuss whether you support it or not, I will summarize now, thanks for your discussion. before I leave, just one comment: I don't see solutions here solving any IPv6 problem, they are solving IPv4 problem by assiging unlmited Ipv4 address, it greatly prolong the life of IPv4 such a great invention, congratulations. but we are not convinced that IETF should standardize it. thanks again. -Hui
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
