Le 19 janv. 2010 à 11:01, Xu Xiaohu a écrit :

>>> 
>>> By the way, would it be better for preventing the routing loops if there
>>> were some well-known bits in the 6rd prefix?
>> 
>> This would IMHO add complexity, unnecessarily since routing loops
>> are avoided
>>  with the described ingoing and outgoing filters in the BRs.
> 
> Sorry for late response. Will this approach of blindly filtering any packet
> sourced from the BRs drop the normal tunneled packets mistakenly? 


The draft says:
   To avoid forwarding loops via other internal relays, the BR should
   employ outgoing and incoming IPv4 packets filters, filtering out all
   known relay addresses for internal 6rd BRs, ISATAP routers or 6to4
   relays, including the well known anycast address space for 6to4.

In my understanding, this will not filter any packet that should be forwarded.

RD
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to