Brian, >> Draft-despres-softwire-6a44-00, coauthored with Brian and Sheng, has just >> been posted (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-despres-softwire-6a44-00). >> It describes a solution for ISPs to offer native IPv6 across IPv4-only CPEs >> (NAT44 CPEs). >> >> It results from convergence discussion between authors of >> draft-carpenter-6man-sample-00 and draft-despres-softwire-6rdplus-00, taking >> into account comments made by authors of draft-lee-softwire-6rd-udp-01, and >> those made other Softwire WG participants since IETF 78. >> >> It is submitted to become, after discussion in the WG, a Softwire I-D. > > By the way, we do discuss in the draft why it's a useful alternative to > both tunnel brokers (such as Hexago and SixXs) or Teredo. We don't > explicitly discuss why we think it's also a useful alternative to an L2TP > solution, but the arguments are, I think, similar to those for the tunnel > brokers (apart from our "hobbyist" comment).
perhaps you could also add some deployment considerations with regards to host tunneling versus "network" tunneling? cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
