Remi,
> >The tradeoff could then be summarized as: > +----------------------------+--------------------+-----------------+ > | | Stateful (4over6) | Stateless (4rd) | > +----------------------------+--------------------+-----------------+ > | Customizable services | + | - | > | -------------------------- | ------------------ | --------------- | > | Ease of operation | - | + | > | -------------------------- | ------------------ | --------------- | > | Scalability | - | + | > | -------------------------- | ------------------ | --------------- | > | Invetment cost | - | + | > | minimization | | | > +----------------------------+--------------------+-----------------+ This choice of stateful or stateless are not so clear-cut. I guess we all agree that there are pros and cons in both camps. For example: stateful would yield better utilization of IPv4 addresses. It also decouples the IPv4 address from IPv6 address which makes the IPv4 address design a little easier. Your table is very much favor to stateless, I think this doesn't capture all the points. Regards, Yiu > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
