I want to eacho Satoru's comment that this draft wasn't intended to compare stateless and stateful transition mechanisms. This draft only describes the motivations.
On 7/26/11 11:19 AM, "Satoru Matsushima" <[email protected]> wrote: >Thanks, actually we had some trade-off explanation in previous version. >But due to focus more on the motivation, current version doesn't mention >the trade-off. Since the purpose of this document is to describe >motivations, and kick-off to develop stateless solution, the authors >focus to motivation otherwise analysis work. I agree that trade-off >analysis is significant, but it would be better to be another document >outside of which the motivation draft bears. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
