> >Hi Yiu,all, > >I see the first use case worth good value to work on, as the reason I stated >during meeting: operators would happy with it because otherwise (the second >case), means moving AFTR lower location, which ends up with more CAPEX. >
This is not correct. Please take a look at Broadband Forum document WT-242 on IPv6 migration (or read my previous mail :-) ). You can not make one correct from two wrongs. Regards, Behcet _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
