Ah. Ok :-) English isn't my first language. Please bear with me :-p On 7/28/11 10:13 AM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >Hi Yiu, > >It was a joke. > >We need some sense of humor in IETF. > >I also support >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-qin-softwire-dslite-multicast-04 > >Behcet > >> Dear Behcat, >> >> Can you elaborate it a little more? I don¹t quite follow what makes one >> correct from two wrongs. What is the technical argument of this >>statement? >> >> Thanks, >> Yiu >> >> On 7/28/11 9:45 AM, "Behcet Sarikaya" <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >> > >> > >> >> >> >>Hi Yiu,all, >> >> >> >>I see the first use case worth good value to work on, as the reason >>I >> >>stated >> >>during meeting: operators would happy with it because otherwise (the >> >>second >> >>case), means moving AFTR lower location, which ends up with more >>CAPEX. >> >> >> > >> >This is not correct. >> >Please take a look at Broadband Forum document WT-242 on IPv6 >>migration >> >(or read >> >my previous mail :-) ). >> >You can not make one correct from two wrongs. >> > >> >Regards, >> > >> >Behcet >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
