Hi Satoru, >> However, if we introduce multiple domains with multiple IPv4 prefix pools ( >> the number of each domain is N1, N2, N3,... Nm) , then the entry number of >> IPv4 routing table will be N1+N2+N3+..+Nm. In current situation, Nm would >> not be a small number anymore. So maybe some more optimization work will >> still be needed to make it more "stateless" ? > >What do you mean 'the entry number of IPv4 routing table'? >Do you presume that your IGP routing has almost 300K routes as same number of >current internet full routes?
If I get Qiong correctly, she means that, suppose the IPv4 IGP addresses blocks are quite de-aggregated already. If the ISP upgrade the network to IPv6, and support IPv4 using stateless 4v6 with the same IPv4 address distribution, then the IPv4 IGP kind of introduce the IPv4 IGP routing table into IPv6. If this situation does exists, then it's an interesting operation problem. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
