On Jul 29, 2011 7:15 AM, "Rémi Després" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Le 29 juil. 2011 à 15:48, Satoru Matsushima a écrit : > > > Cameron, > ... > > Stateless is not exclusive with stateful one, and also NAT64. > > I agree with Hui. > > +1 > RD >
Ok. I do think the draft would benefit from narrowing some of the options. It seemed to me that statelessness was a key feature, but I may have misread. Either way, I think it is helpful if the true cost and benefits of statelessness is explored. It sounds like there may be a seperate thread on this. I am skeptical about stateless operation scaling. I don't even have 2000 ports per user (growth to 2015 ...), and I don't want to get into a position where I have to tactically move ipv4 addresses around to meet demand. > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
