On Jul 29, 2011 7:15 AM, "Rémi Després" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Le 29 juil. 2011 à 15:48, Satoru Matsushima a écrit :
>
> > Cameron,
> ...
> > Stateless is not exclusive with stateful one, and also NAT64.
> > I agree with Hui.
>
> +1
> RD
>

Ok. I do think the draft would benefit from narrowing some of the options.
It seemed to me that statelessness was a key feature, but I may have
misread.

Either way, I think it is helpful if the true cost and benefits of
statelessness is explored. It sounds like there may be a seperate thread on
this.

I am skeptical about stateless operation scaling. I don't even have 2000
ports per user (growth to 2015 ...), and I don't want to get into a position
where I have to tactically move ipv4 addresses around to meet demand.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to