Cameron, On 2011/07/29, at 10:27, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> I am skeptical about stateless operation scaling. I don't even have 2000 > ports per user (growth to 2015 ...), and I don't want to get into a position > where I have to tactically move ipv4 addresses around to meet demand. That's a trade-off. Many people require to make clear the trade-off among stateless and steteful that the softwire wg is now going to do. Fundamentally, to support much port demand, applications should utilize IPv6. Otherwise, restricted port sets should be utilize as much as possible. There are some techniques could be helpful to do it, multiple mapping rule is for example. cheers, --satoru _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
