Le 1 août 2011 à 16:36, Cameron Byrne a écrit : > > are you in fact proposing that 3GPP IPv4v6 bearers be _replaced_ by > > IPv6-only bearers with IPv4/IPv6 translation, or that both should coexist > > to widen the number of options? > > > > > Both do exist today. I have had the latter in beta for over a year and it > will go to production soon. >
Thank you for sharing this information. I infer that the extra header size of 20 octets that 4V6 Translation has, compared to the IPv4v6 Bearer, isn't considered a show stopper. Hopefully, we won't hear too much of the header size argument in the future. Regards, RD
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
