Nejc Škoberne wrote, on 08/23/2011 11:43 AM: > But since we know, that these packets will be translated two times in a row, > we could just avoid the TCP/UDP recalculation, I guess? Would this work?
Yes, we've been discussing this internally among co-authors of draft-despres-softwire-4rd-addmapping. The conclusion was that the transport checksum does not need to be modified. A consequence is that the 4rd address scheme does not need to care about checksum neutrality (contrary to e.g. NAT64 and NAT66). Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
