Dear Simon, > Yes, we've been discussing this internally among co-authors of > draft-despres-softwire-4rd-addmapping. The conclusion was that the transport > checksum does not need to be modified.
OK. But this then means, that if there are any stateful devices like stateful firewalls, IPS/IDS systems in between, we could have problems, right? > A consequence is that the 4rd address > scheme does not need to care about checksum neutrality (contrary to e.g. NAT64 > and NAT66). Sorry, but I don't understand this. Can you please paraphrase? Thanks, Nejc _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
