Hi Remi, Ok, we will draft a document on using existing tools for O&M in dIVI/dIVI-PD very soon.
Best, Congxiao 2011/10/4 Rémi Després <[email protected]> > Hi Xing, Congxiao, > > Le 4 oct. 2011 à 15:26, xiaohong deng a écrit : > ... > > It IMHO would be helpful if anybody would clarify some details to 1) > > first prove source based classification is either a valid or a > > non-valid requirement for address mapping; For this regard, I would > > begin with that why do we think the source based IPv4 classification > > ability instead of the more general five-tuple based IPv4 > > classification ability should be reserved, when deliver IPv4 over > > IPv6? > > What about starting from your conclusion slide in Beijing? > > It says: > > "dIVI/dIVI-PD can use existing tools for O&M > – Null route > – ACL > – eACL > – PBR > – QoS > – Caching" > > Open questions include: > - Which addresses are used for these O&M functions? (source? destination?, > CE to CE?, CE to BR?, BR to CE?) > - Are ports within IPv6 payloads used, or just addresses? > > Thank you if you can share your views on this. > > Regards, > RD > > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
