On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Congxiao Bao <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Remi, > > Ok, we will draft a document on using existing tools for O&M in dIVI/dIVI-PD > very soon.
Thanks for sharing and look forward to it. Cheers, Xiaohong > > Best, > > Congxiao > > 2011/10/4 Rémi Després <[email protected]> >> >> Hi Xing, Congxiao, >> >> Le 4 oct. 2011 à 15:26, xiaohong deng a écrit : >> ... >> > It IMHO would be helpful if anybody would clarify some details to 1) >> > first prove source based classification is either a valid or a >> > non-valid requirement for address mapping; For this regard, I would >> > begin with that why do we think the source based IPv4 classification >> > ability instead of the more general five-tuple based IPv4 >> > classification ability should be reserved, when deliver IPv4 over >> > IPv6? >> >> What about starting from your conclusion slide in Beijing? >> >> It says: >> >> "dIVI/dIVI-PD can use existing tools for O&M >> – Null route >> – ACL >> – eACL >> – PBR >> – QoS >> – Caching" >> >> Open questions include: >> - Which addresses are used for these O&M functions? (source? destination?, >> CE to CE?, CE to BR?, BR to CE?) >> - Are ports within IPv6 payloads used, or just addresses? >> >> Thank you if you can share your views on this. >> >> Regards, >> RD >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Softwires mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
