On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Cameron Byrne <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2011 6:58 AM, "Alain Durand" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> On Nov 4, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Henderickx, Wim (Wim) wrote: >> >> > Reinaldo, >> > >> > What happens if a customer wants to get more ports than the CPE owns? >> >> Similar to the other stateless proposals such a 4rd or divi, there is no >> provision to dynamically extend that range allocated by the ISP. >> The consensus that was expressed a number of time in the wg is that if you >> need this flexibility, >> a stateless solution is the wrong approach, you'd be be better of with a >> stateful solution. >> >> >> > How would PCP operate with this model? >> >> This is an interesting question... This should make the life of the PCP >> server rather easy, as there will be no state to keep there too. >> > > Interesting indeed, no pcp and no alg. > > So for stateless solutions anything that falls out of your static cgn > allocation will not work? Like sip/rtp? Multiplayer games? Ftp? Rtsp? Pptp? > Ipsec? ... > > Sorry if I missed something obvious for how these are enabled. > > Cb
Ok, i think i figured this one out, the SD-CPE will force the ports into the range supported on the CGN. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
